Ders Kitabı / Malzemesi / Önerilen Kaynaklar | - Lebow, Richard Ned, “Classical Realism”, Tim Dunne et al (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 2. Edition, Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 58-76.
- Burchill, Scott, “Liberalizm”, Scott Burchill et al (eds.) Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, 3. Bölüm
- Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, “Neoliberalism”, Tim Dunne et al (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, pp.116-135.
- Mearsheimer, John J. “Structural Realism”, Tim Dunne et al (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, pp.77-94
- Russett, Bruce “Liberalism”, Tim Dunne et al (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, pp. 95-115.
- Donnely, Jack “Realizm”, Scott Burchill et al (eds.) Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, (çev.) Ali Aslan ve Muhammed Ağcan, 2. Bölüm
- Linklater, Andrew, “Marx ve Marksizm”, Scott Burchill et al (eds.) Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, 5. Bölüm.
- Brewer, Anthony, “Marxist Theories of Imperialism”, Routledge, 1980, pp. 1-24.
- Rupert, Mark, “Marxism and Critical Theory”, Tim Dunne et al (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, pp. 157-176.
- Dunne, Tim, “The English School”, Tim Dunne et al (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, pp.135-156.
- Linklater, Andrew, “İngiliz Okulu”, Scott Burchill et al (eds.) Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, 4. Bölüm.
- Fierke, K.M. “Constructivism”, Tim Dunne et al (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, pp. 177-194.
- Reus-Smit, Christian, “Konstrüktivizm”, Scott Burchill et al (eds.) Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, 9. Bölüm.
- Alexander Wendt, “Constructing International Politics”, International Security, Cilt 20, No 1, 1995, ss.71-81.
- Linklater, Andrew, “The Achievements of Critical Theory”, Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, Sovereignty and Humanity, London: Routledge, 2007, Chapter 3 pp. 45-60.
- Devetak, Richard, “Eleştirel Teori”, Scott Burchill et al (eds.) Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, 7. Bölüm.
- Campbell, David, “Poststructuralism”, Tim Dunne et al (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, pp. 213-237.
- Devetak, Richard, “Post-yapısalcılık”, Scott Burchill et al (eds.) Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, 8. Bölüm.
- Tickner, J. Ann and Sjoberg, Laura, “Feminism”, Tim Dunne et al (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, pp. 213-237.
- True, Jacqui, “Feminizm”, Scott Burchill et al (eds.) Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, 10. Bölüm.
- Eckersley, Robyn, “Green Theory”, Tim Dunne et al (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, pp.257-277.
- Paterson, Matthew, “Yeşil Siyaset”, Scott Burchill et al (eds.) Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, 11. Bölüm.
- Grovogui, Siba N. “Postcolonialism”, Tim Dunne et al (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, pp.238-256.
- Slater, David, ‘Postcolonial Questions for Global Times,’ Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 5, No.4, 1998, ss. 647-678.
- Erksine, Toni, “Normative IR Theory”, Tim Dunne et al (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, pp.36-57.
- Der Derian, James, “Post-Theory: The Eternal Return of Ethics in International Relations”, Michael Doyle and John Ikenberry (eds.) New Thinking in International Relations Theory, Boulder: Westview Press, 1997, pp. 54-76.
- Shapcott, Richard, “ Towards A Thin Cosmopolitanism”, Justice, Community and Dialogue in International Relations, Cambridge: CUP, 2011, ss. 209-232.
- Wight, Colin and Kurki, Milja, “International Relations and Social Sciences”, Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki and Steve Smith (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, ss. 13-35.
- Smith, Steve, “Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory”, Tim Dunne et al (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 2. Edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp.1-13.
- Burchill, Scott ve Linklater, Andrew, “Giriş”, Scott Burchill et al (eds.) Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, 1. Bölüm.
- Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, & Steve Smith (2013) (Eds.). International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Karen A. Mingst, Heather Elko McKibben, Ivan M. Arreguín-Toft (2017). Essentials of International Relations. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
• Christian Reus-Smit, and Duncan Snidal(ed). (2008) The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Şaban Kardaş Ali Balcı(ed.) (2014). Uluslararası İlişkilere Giriş. İstanbul: Küre Y ayınları
- Stephen M. Walt. (1998, Spring). International Relations: One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy, 110, 29-46. Jack Snyder. (2004, November/December). One World, Rival Theories. Foreign Policy, 145, 52-62.
- Week 3: Mearsheimer, John J. (1990) ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’. International Security, 15, 5-56. Week 4: Huntington, Samuel. “The Clash of Civilizations?” Foreign Affairs, Vol.72 No.3 (Summer 1993), pp. 23-49 Available from: JSTOR Journals. Week 5: Hoffman, Mark (1987) ‘Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 16, no. 2: 231-50. Week 6: CHECKEL, Jeffrey T. (1998). The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory World Politics, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 324-348. Week 7: Tickner, J. Ann (2005) ‘What Is Your Research Program? Some Feminist Answers to International Relations Methodological Questions’, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 49, No. 1, Pp. 1-21.
- Week 10: Krasner,S.D. Transforming International Regimes: What the Third World Wants and Why, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, World System Debates (Mar., 1981), pp.119-148 (Article) Week 11: Agathangelou, A. & L. H. M. Ling (2004) ‘Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11’. International Studies Quarterly 48, 517- 538. Week 13: Bigo, Didier (2002) ‘Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease’. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27, 63-92.
|